Cornwalls
  • About Us
  • Legal Expertise
  • Industry Focus
  • Our People
  • Working Here
  • Sharing Knowledge
  • Our Community
  • International Reach
Back
     
     

    Proposed Victorian landholder duty model

    Posted on: 26 Sep, 2011 |  Contacts: Michael Kohn, Elpis Korosidis
     

     

    The Victorian government is currently seeking submissions on its proposed introduction of a landholder duty model to replace the existing land rich duty as of 1 July 2012. Both the landholder and land rich models impose duty on acquiring, over a threshold, interest in landholding entities. 

    Existing land rich duty

    The current land rich duty model imposes duty when an interest in a 'land rich' entity is acquired. The class of potential 'land rich' entities is limited to private companies, private unit trust schemes and wholesale unit trust schemes:

    • that hold land in Victoria with an unencumbered value of at least $1 million; and
    • whose landholdings, whether within or outside Australia, comprise 60% or more of the unencumbered value of all their assets. 

     

    Acquiring, over a period of three years, an interest of 20% or more in a private unit trust scheme or 50% or more in a private company or wholesale unit trust scheme will give rise to the duty liability.

    Proposed landholder duty model

    Who is affected?

    The proposed landholder duty model makes several changes to the existing land rich duty model. Most significantly, it enlarges the potential tax base by expanding the class of entities to which the model applies. 

     

    The model achieves this by two methods. First, the class of taxable landholding entities is increased to include listed companies and listed unit trust schemes, in addition to those currently provided for in the land rich duty model. Second, the proposed model removes the requirement that 60% or more of a taxable landholding entity's assets must be in the form of landholdings; providing the entity has land in Victoria with an unencumbered value of at least $1 million, it will be subject to the new model. 

     

    What constitutes a dutiable acquisition of an interest?

    The proposed model expands the definition of what constitutes an acquired 'interest', defining it as being the greater of the following:

    1. a percentage representing the extent to which a person would be entitled to participate in a distribution of the property of the landholder on a winding up (the sole definition under the land rich duty model);
    2. a percentage representing the proportion of votes that a person would be entitled to exercise or control at a general meeting, assuming that all shareholders or unitholders exercised their voting rights; and
    3. a percentage representing the extent to which a person is entitled to the economic interests of the landholder, including dividends or distributions of income. 

     

    The threshold of interest acquisition that will incur duty will remain the same for entities provided for under the land rich duty model; ie 20% in a private unit trust scheme, or 50% in a private company or a wholesale unit trust scheme. For listed companies or unit trusts, an acquisition of 90% will constitute a dutiable acquisition. 

     

    Further, the existing three year period in which acquisitions of interests will be aggregated is to be removed. Under the proposed model, all acquisitions made by a person (or an associated person) in a landholding entity - after such an entity first acquired land in Victoria - are to be aggregated. Duty will only be charged on those acquisitions occurring within a three year period before the date of the acquisition that raised the total aggregate to the appropriate threshold.   

     

    Amount of duty

    The amount of duty to be charged under the landholder duty model will be calculated in accordance with the rates applicable to land transfers. However, landholder duty in listed entities will only be charged at the rate of one tenth of the general rate of transfer duty. 

     

    Other amendments

    The proposed model also brings in other amendments in relation to defining the term 'fixture', reforming tracing provisions in determining a landholder's indirect ownership of landholdings and removing the existing discretion for the Commissioner of State Revenue to exempt transactions on the grounds that it is just and reasonable. 

     

    Authored by: Michael Kohn and Matt Foley, Cornwall Stodart


    RELATED INFORMATION

    LEGAL EXPERTISE

    • Commercial Property
    • Revenue Law
     

     

    SUBSCRIBE

    Register for our Legal Expertise and Industry Focus updates.Register


    CornwallStodart

    Contact Us | Disclaimer | Privacy | Site Map 
    Client Feedback

    Level 10, 114 William Street, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia | Phone +61 3 9608 2000 | Fax +61 3 9608 2222
    Copyright © 2010 Cornwall Stodart Enhancing Success ®. All rights reserved.